Really!?!


That’s the name of a popular “Saturday Night Live” skit in which “anchor” Seth Meyers reports the latest news of the day with incredulous skepticism and disgust. The piece plays on the old comedy maxim that things are funny because they’re true. But it turns that truism on its ear by simply using the news itself as the butt of the joke.


Anyone who’s seen the latest Anthony Weiner headlines (Weiner — Really!?! ) can see why it works so well. You just reach a point with some news stories, where you have to throw up your hands and say, “Really!?!”


That’s exactly how I’ve felt the story unfolded around the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s recall of approximately 1 million drain covers that began just before the Memorial Day weekend. This latest development in the ever-developing story that is the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool & Spa Safety Act Debacle (VGBAD for short) is worthy of its own SNL Really!?! treatment. But since Seth Meyers probably won’t tackle it, I thought I’d give it a shot.


So, the CPSC decides to recall about a million drain covers two days before the biggest day in swimming of the year. Further, it says, the only recourse for affected pools is to shut down. Really!?! That’s like telling kids there’s not going to be any presents the day before Christmas — after they’d worked in sweat shops to make their own gifts! CPSC couldn’t have started the recall sooner, or picked a less painful way of dealing with the issue, like say draining every other public pool in the nation and popping all floaties? Really!?!


Then, after the CPSC announces this massive recall, it gives a bunch of exceptions to the rule, saying “most” dual main drain pools are exempt. But warning operators to check with their manufacturers if they’re not sure. Oh, and you better make sure you keep good records about the whole thing because CPSC will be checking. Really!?! This is the same agency that did at least three different interpretations and reinterpretations to the original law that got us here in the first place. For a pool operator, trusting anything from CPSC at this point, is like agreeing to buy that nice piece of swampland from your ex-con cousin-in-law and then giving him your house, too. Really!?!


Now we’re finding out that several manufacturers whose products have been recalled have not yet “ramped up” production for the replacements or retrofits. And it’s murky at best as to who should be doing the replacements or retrofits from manufacturers who do have the parts available. Oh, and even though CPSC says manufacturers will foot the bill, operators are hearing otherwise. Really!?!


So let’s put this into perspective: A law was shoved down the industry’s throat without proper timing or available product necessary to comply at a time when most facilities were already struggling financially. When the product finally was made available it got pushed through a shoddy certification process that resulted in “potentially” unsafe drain covers that cost a fortune to install. The affected covers (about a million of them) were then recalled two days before opening day of swimming, and here’s the kicker, folks, REPLACMENT PRODUCT IS NOT YET AVAILABLE! Really!?!


CPSC couldn’t have worked with manufacturers to ensure that when they told an entire nation that pools may be unsafe, they’d also have the necessary fix? That’s like the president going on TV and telling everyone that a meteor is screaming toward the planet that threatens to wipe out life as we know it. But not to worry. First of all, no one has died from a meteor strike yet. “And we want to keep it that way.” Secondly, scientists have created a special force field to protect us. Well, most of us. In some parts of the country, the force fields aren’t ready yet. But they’re “forthcoming.” Really!?!

Views: 13

Tags: CPSC, VGB, covers, drain, investigation, recall

Comment

You need to be a member of AI Connect to add comments!

Join AI Connect

Comment by Clint Burnham on July 6, 2011 at 11:45am

At least they didn't require us to install a flux capacitor that operates at a minimum of 1.21 gigawatts!

 

Although in many cases it may have made about just as much sense. 

Comment by Jim Wheeler on June 26, 2011 at 10:31am
Wow Gary nice to know I am not the only ranter... LOL
Comment by Lester Brehm on June 23, 2011 at 10:41pm
Good one, Gary !

© 2014   Created by AI Connect.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service